AstroBin Any experience with this camera and would this lens be a good fit? The Heart and Soul Nebulae captured using a DSLR and the Rokinon 135mm lens. Perhaps this impression of unreal sharpness is strengthened by the contrast to the extremely creamy bokeh you typically get in the same photo. The lens arrived next day, less than 24 hours after I hit the order button. Great post; thanks for the detailed information. There's just nothing there. The second best, is the Hoya Pro One Digital MC UV(0) filter. Moreover if we have a serendipitous moment regarding a new (or used) lens, that's a good thing. These are affordably available on eBay, and result in perfectly round star images, the way nature intended them to be. The 135 is lighter, but that's its only advantage.
Rokinon 135mm F/2 Lens for ASTROPHOTOGRAPHY - YouTube Rokinon 135mm F2.0 ED Lens. Interesting. (purchased for $900), reviewed December 14th, 2006 Sometimes though, we stumble upon a great lens design which is strong in all three. (purchased for $860), reviewed March 9th, 2017 (purchased for $1,000), reviewed February 4th, 2010 Because it's an L-series lens by Canon, you can be sure that the image quality and performance of the 24-105mm meet the demanding aspects of astrophotography such as focus and star quality. Begun in 1975, the Pentax K-mount legacy continues to this day. 2. Writer Anno Huidekoper takes a look at what this manual SLR can do and how it stacks up to its contemporaries. Does this work well with any of the 1.4x / 1.7x / 2.0x Teleconverters (extenders / barlows)? To remedy this, I reduced the star size in post, and I started shooting at F/4 to really tighten things up. Photography is art and technology, the latter serving the first.Photography is not something arty with a lot of gadgetry. RATING. The RedCat is deeper at 250mm, and after that, youre into 300-400mm territory which pulls galaxies and nebulae even closer. There are, of course, outlierssuch as the legendary unicorn lens Canon EF 200mm F2but that one isn't a great alternative unless you are cool with spending $5,700 and carrying around something about as wieldy as a fire hydrant. This lens is simply lighter, cheaper & faster (f/2.0 vs f/2.8). This lens has a long focus adjustment ring, with great tension.
Lensrentals.com - Rent Lenses and Cameras from Canon, Nikon, Olympus f2, very sharp, virtually without CAs, contrast, colour, lightwight, buildings. But you couldn't have because you don't know even as much as this guy. It can isolate subject while being tack sharp with beautiful creamy bokeh when used at f2. Some of the primes have a special look to them, but only the 70-200 is indispensable. Fantastic IQ & Bokeh. But she might as well be in front of a green screen. Whatever lens you pick in the end, you will make a great purchase. Based on my handful of experiences with this lens in the backyard, I have found these traits to hold true. Sigma 105/2.8 DG EX Macro (very sharp at infinity) Digital sensors are roughly 5 times as sharp as 400-speed film. Not heavy like the white tele-zooms. This way the focus will favor the red light which is more objectionable within a star image than a bit of blue. Imaging Resource 1998 - 2023. Sharp but smooth at the same time. http://www.idyll.com/135. This leaves you with a buttery bokeh and an object in perfect focus. Prime lenses are typically lighter as they do not need the additional glass and mechanics required to zoom at varying magnifications. 645 lenses such as the mamiya apo line and pentax edif can operate within these conditions without vignetting on apsc sensors. Also Nikon DC 135mm f/2 is a great lens, a little better than 135mm Canon When i just judge by the indicator line as i click through, it seems like its 19 that gets skipped wondering if there is anything more definite? Include the Carl Zeiss in your research though, it might be an interesting lens for you, even if it is a bit pricey for what you get. In the past, Ive covered a number of different lenses, from the Sigma 24mm F/1.4 to the Canon EF 300mm F/4L. But do some experimenting before you decide. Canon CR-N700 4K PTZ Camera with 15x Zoom. Simple fact is the Samyang 135/2 is a remarkably good lens for the price, and it offers a set of optical characteristics that typically cost 2-4x more. It would seem to be a better use of a camera to first look for a suitable background, and then and only then to use bokeh. AF is accurate and very fast. My only complaint about this lens is that the depth of the lens shade forces me to remove the shade in order to remove or replace the lens cap (my hands are fairly large). No telephoto lens can be used with cameras modified by the removal of the internal UV/IR cut filter and anti-aliasing filter. Micael Widell is a photography enthusiast based in Stockholm, Sweden. Got it! Better than nothing I guess, would depend on how much it raises the price. (purchased for $700), reviewed October 9th, 2012 (purchased for $700), reviewed June 13th, 2009
Some lenses are incurable. Standards have risen in recent years. sigh, overdone bokeh and centre sharpness bear little relevance to the art of this hobby. In the right hands this lens really does have "magic pixie dust", as a friend once described. Same thing as people mistake "shallow DOF" to blurry background. About 3 hours of exposures split between Narrowband, Broadband and short exposure shots to make an HDR image. OTOH you can now get a 70-180 f2.8 zoom that weights virtually the same and is only a tiny bit longer (Tamron's on E mount, like 20mm longer than the AF SY or most other modern 135s), and there's lighter than ever 85/1.4s (eg Sigma's DN for L/E mount) that can achieve a very similar look while coming in at 600g, tho at an even higher price. The logic of this article can be applied to a 200/2.8 as well. In an effort to save money, Id like to start using a Canon 80D that we already own to start picking targets and imaging. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder. At least not in my camera (Sony A6000), the focal length in a crop sensor does not make it very suitable for portrait, the photo detail is something else, but without AF that type of photography with that focal distance and at least 80 cm of the subject it requires too much dedication, with how comfortable the DMF approach mode is for that type of photography Also in my mount it does not have any communication with the camera (it does not have a chip, it only has it for Nikon). The California Nebula. Large focus ring. There have been a lot of Tele-Tessars over the years. I bought it for its bokeh. I just love the lightning fast & accurate focus of this lens. If you shoot things in motion on a Canon body, and need some reach without massive bulk, this is the one I recommend. One very popular lens for bokeh fiends is the Canon 85mm F1.2it can produce extremely creamy out of focus backgrounds. (37% is difference, so you get little more, about 15.5Mpix). The sigma 150mm f2.8 tests very well, zeiss 135mm apo sonnar, and leica 180mm f3.5 apo all proven performers on star tests. Beware others critical comments here about how flat these images look, the author has chosen specific topics and viewpoints to highlight f2 with this lens, so see the wow review for what it is please and the negative comments need placing in context. Definetely the most sharpest lens which I have ever seen. Defocus control enables the photographer to use an aperture of f/4 for the subject and to adjust the amount of background blur or the amount of foreground blur. Click on following link to view images This brings me to my question. The image below highlights the creative freedom this lens provides. The 200f2.8 L is excellent - I am using it right now. Great question Scott I think it depends on the image. Photos posted are pleasing but I'd be into seeing something new. Does the bright star reflection bother you? It is fantastic on my old 5d. Testing on an EOS-5D, we see that it's sharpness is almost as good wide open in the corners as on the EOS-20D with its smaller sensor. Some real life images from my photoblog: http://hellabella.de, One of the best and sharpest lens around. Let's unbox, review and test this lens to find out why it is one of the best bang for your buck deals in astrophotography! Personally, I can't stand these circles, and I see them as VERY distracting.Lots of fads come and go, and this is just another one of these fads that some photographers are obsessed with. Every different lens design has different "bokeh" even when the lenses are by specs same, like Canon 135mm f/2 vs Samyang 135mm f/2 are both same, but both render differently, even when both have same DOF. Barney and Chris have been shooting the new Sony 50mm F1.4 GM, and we have a bunch of full resolution samples for you to peruse. Now i have the f2.8 version, and while the resolution is better it s under no circumstance as good as the f/4 one. The aesthetic quality of the blur in the out-of-focus parts of the image are buttery smooth and soft. In these situations, a portable, wide-field imaging rig wins. To see even more example photos using the Rokinon 135mm lens (or Samyang branded version), go ahead a perform a search on Astrobin or Flickr, with the appropriate filter. I really wanted to use, and like, a 135mm f2 lens so I bought the Canon version. Magical images, great AF, great close focusing abilities. its useful to keep in mind these bokeh circles are the result of light sources bright lamps from autos Christmas lights streetlamps etc and are seriously overused in articles on lenses with strong subject\ backround seperations, they approach parody in the way they characterise subject separation, for most purposes and in most portrait situations its less highlight dominant backrounds that grace a photo. I love this lens, The Sharpest Lens available for Eos cameras IMO There was no reason to test any other because, when stopped down to 49mm, F6.1, this lens is simply perfect, comparable to any APO on the market. The original poster is right that it was a compromise though and stopping down was necessary for critical sharpness and a better image. Heh, it's amazing how far Samyang has come since this article (I'm loving their 45 & 75 f1.8), and kinda amusing that they ended up delivering exactly what you asked for Kinda reminds me of that article by Roger Cicala about how long lens development takes. (purchased for $900), reviewed December 4th, 2006 Besides, adding IS would mean adding extra elements and that would very likely reduce the image quality. Rain or shine, it's hard to find a camera that does all the OM-5 can for the price. Not rude at all, a fair comment.
Digital Cameras & Digital Camera Kits | Camera Gear | B&H This lens is available on Amazon for most camera bodies. Typical L construction. Before I go any further, Id like to share a photo from Gabriel Millou of the Andromeda Galaxy using a Canon 1300D. Otherwise this lens is absolutely incredible. From the moment I reviewed the first sub-exposure on the display screen of my camera, I feel in love with the mid-range magnification of a 135mm lens. never mind.. confirmed from others that F19 is indeed the one that is excluded on this lens! I purchased this lens for the purposes of wide-field deep-sky astrophotography from my light-polluted backyard (shown below), and when traveling to a dark sky site. Images that sing. I got my first 400 around 50 years ago, and I must say that each step forward feels like a revolution, for a while. If you must have autofocus, and care about weight, buy the Canon. If you have pictures taken using the Rokinon 135mm F/2 lens, please feel free to share your results in the comments section (links to Astrobin, Flickr or your personal gallery are fine). Both the 135 and 200mm Canon l lenses are winners IMHO. So I sold it for nearly what I bought it for and chalked it up to a learning experience.
Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM Lens Review - The-Digital-Picture.com Backwards compatible (film). Whereas quality apochromats can be corrected with broad band filters, such as the Astronomik UV/IR cut filter or the CLS-CCD filter, telephoto lenses can not. The article was based on the numerous lenses with which I have personal experience - that is naturally limited. But when holes in text prompt me to look at the work of the writer, there is nothing professional there either. You can also find him as @mwroll on Instagram and 500px. I loved the Nikon 80-400G for a year, or so, and then found everything with it wrong, and got rid of it. Just not useful if you already have traditional focal lengths. The Rho Ophiuchi Cloud Complex by Eric Cauble using the Samyang 135mm F/2 lens. Light weight and robust. Fast focus, Super sharp, Well built, Awesome for low light. http://www.astrovale-f-2/index.html, Hi Lord_Vader, We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens. 10/10 (Editor's Choice) Check Price. These were just a tad less sharp at the corners than their Canon competition, but certainly extremely sharp all over the field if closed down one stop or even half a stop. Have you ever come across this phenomena? The 135mm Rokinon with the Canon Rebel seems like a pretty good setup. Read on to find out which you should be using and why! Its a no brainer if you use this focal length. Part of it might be that they were designed for film photography and modern digital sensor are far more demanding in terms of optical quality. The Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM Lens makes an excellent indoor sports lens. But I would argue that a 135mm F2 lens produces even greater bokeh, thanks to the long focal length that compresses the background far more than the 85mm lens. This is an amazing lens.Very sharp wide open and no improvement when stopped own. On the 135/2 all you've got is the bare metal. thanks for the write-up.. i just got this lens and have just been trying it out. That is the story.#7: Leaves.That doesn't work. In this review, however, I am using the lens on a crop sensor (APS-C) Canon EOS 60Da, which puts the field of view at 12.4 degrees. Crazy fast AF! How well do Fujifilm's film simulations match up to their film counterparts? +1 for the 135mm lens. Round one of polls are now open, pick your winners and share your voice. Only con I can think of, and that may be a big one depending on how you plan to use the lens is the lack of weather sealing. I do not use burst mode, but the lens would produce movie-like frames. (purchased for $890), reviewed October 21st, 2005 http://johncarnessali.com/camera-lens-tests/5109, After reading too many long, and arduous threads pertaining to the new Zeiss 135, I felt compelled to share my perspective on the wonderful Canon 135. One of the prime examples of such a design is the "nifty fifty"the 50mm F1.8 lens construction that many lens manufacturers provide. The first telephoto lens of choice, especially recommended for beginners, is the 135mm F2.5 SMC Pentax. Most small refracting telescopes start in the 300 to 400 mm focal length range, and even these are classed as widefield telescopes. For some objects a reflection can take away from the photo because it covers interesting details of the object (Think Alnitak in the Horsehead Nebula). Especially for beginning astrophotographers, who should first invest most of their finances into a good telescope mount, telephoto lenses are an excellent and affordable solution. Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. But I sold it and went back to using a 70-200 (alongside a 24-70). If you want the best possible image quality, and you must have autofocus, and you don't care if it is a bit heavy (maybe you need it for studio use), buy the Sigma. Check out some of the photos he took.
Which Canon EOS M Would be Best for Astrophotography? To achieve creamy bokeh, a lens should have a wide maximum aperture and a long focal length. The one and only 300mm lens I tested is the Zeiss Tele-Tessar 300mm F4.
Canon 135mm F2.8 SF for astrophotography? - Stargazers Lounge How to Find the Perfect Astrophotography Target with Stellarium Valerio, I sold my Canon Lens because in Nikon Lens there is a Defocus control option, very usefull in a daylight photos, as portrait. He loves photography, and runs a YouTube channel with tutorials, lens reviews and photography inspiration. I stopped reading after the part where someone I don't know told me I "should" be doing something. Now - THAT's a lens everyone should have ;). From far to near, the AF is instantaneous. It seems lazy to me. I've missed shots at wide apertures because the DOF is so extremely thin. Samyang 135mm f2, 100mm f2.8, and asperical 16mm f2.8. Such "full spectrum" cameras are somewhat more sensitive in the ultraviolet, but much more sensitive in the deep red and infrared. I'll walk you through all this inc. It is harder work than using a zoom lens, and some shots I just cannot get at all (cannot get close enough, or far enough way) but the shots I do get are so much nicer looking than I get with any other lens that for me and my goals it is a fair trade off. Available in other Styles, Configurations & Kits. It is NOT extremely sharp wide open, it often requires massive AF adjustment on DLSRs (sometimes beyond what the body allows as micro-adjustment) and AF is not reliable enough to consistently ensure sharp focus at full aperture. The 135mm F2 lens design is truly special, and in this article (and the video I made), I want to try to convince you as well. Still - a great portrait lens when used at f/2.8 or f/4, with a creamy bokeh indeed. My Rokinon 135F2 on my crop body is fun to play with.. a budget lens with budget construction on a discontinued camera system.. but hey im just a ham and egger https://flic.kr/p/21nj82V, I had a Canon 135/2 for a while, but I decided I preferred the 100 L used not as a Macro but a normal lens (which my non-L USM 100 Macro was quite poor for). They seem to be really good for NB work. Focus throw. Super Sharp.Super Fast AF. Generally, prime lenses have a reputation for being slightly sharper, and I have found that to be true whether I am shooting a nebula or a Scarlet Tanager. The screws should be set sufficiently tightly to prevent shift, yet not so tightly as to interfere with fine focusing. I found with the 70-200 made me lazy. - Actually though, it's performance is so good that you really have to consider it a bargain, even at the $800-900 street price. One of Canon's best lenses for a reasonable price. And only the cat photo has something OK (but it is a cat shot You easily get them look good). Light falloff (vignetting) gets pretty high (0.73 EV wide open, but drops to 0.3 EV at f/2.8, and only 0.17 EV at f/4. Samyang should definitely make 135 f2 with the same optical formula and AF for Sony EFF and also Nikon F plus Canon EF mount if possible. If the title had been: "Testing My First Telephoto and LOVING IT!!!!!!!. It's March, and in America that means it's time to start arguing over which college athletics team is the best at basketball. I put quotes around the ones that are written on the lens. Sure, that would be swellbut it doesn't matter with regard to how it performs. I have compared many times my 135/2 against my 100/2.8 and there is a big difference. I thought I had to sell my 100/F2.8 macro L but thanks for letting me know I can keep it. I would be careful with the Nikon 135 f/2 DC (I have one). This lens is very sharp, corner to corner wide open. Chromatic aberration is almost eliminated in narrowband, so lenses with that problem may be fine performers. The Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC lens. Of the old teles I've had, Nikon's 400mm f/3.5 was decent, Olympus's 300mm f/4.5 was good (it had a precursor to ED glass) Pentax's 300mm Takumar was TERRIBLE, Pentax's 500mm was terrible, Nikon's 135 f/2.8 Q was ok, and Sigma's 400mm f/5.6 "apo" was satisfactory. Interesting that ancient, low-tech (no ED glass, no special coatings) non-apo telephotos could produce decent results compared to something modern. If you can tolerate vignetting, there are many normal 35mm lenses that are great wide open. Yes, each can produce different results (And that's why I keep and use several different lenses), but my point is that sharpness or bokeh are not the only factors for portraits -- sometimes it just comes down to convenience or price! I find 400gm as the tolerable weight limit for a lens on my panasonic gx85, and I am guessing following telephoto lenses would satisfy the itch to get good bokeh shots, 1. No telephoto lens, and no apochromat, is sufficiently corrected to accomodate such a wide spectral range. My 24-70L needs to be stopped down to f5.6 to begin to match the sharpness of my 135L at f2.0 (the test shots were of the portrait of Andrew Jackson on a $20 bill).
Samyang/Rokinon 135mm F2 for Astrophotography: Review & Imaging Tests Could use a few updates. Finally, to prevent image shift during exposure, all telephoto lenses must be supported at two points: at the camera end, and at the far end with a large retaining ring. It's not a bad lens, probably a great one, even if it doesn't seems really as sharp as a basic 85mm f/1.8 (used at f/2.8) , but it's a bad idea to work wide open if you don't need to. It's just "girl" in front of blurriness.#2: Plants on a pond.It's okay. Thanks for the fine article and the thought you put into it. A Canon 70-200L IS II at 200mm at f2.8 has all the same characteristics of the Canon 135L. I've seen several listed but here are more to consider. I've tested some of the old Pentax 6x7 lenses with a friend. Nice image, andysea. All lenses mentioned below are adaptable to Canon EOS cameras with slim EOS adapters which allow the lenses to focus just slightly past infinity. I just wish this lens had IS for low light and portraits with flash. To shoot indoors under typical gymnasium lighting, you often need f/2.0 or wider to get a shutter speed high enough to stop the action. It is a heavy lens. The cat is a case for the bit bucket i my opinion - it has no composition, a distracting background and a random parts of the body in focus - the same picture made with a smart phone could not look worse. Definitely now on my to-buy list. He has quite a breadth photos many of which are quite good. Best lens for portraiture I've ever tried. I just purchased a very lightly used Canon 200mm F2.8L II USM for $620 from a great online dealer and can't wait for an opportunity to try it out with my Astronomik CLS clip on a T4i at a dark site. Yes there's bokeh. Over the years, Ive shot deep-sky targets at varying focal lengths from 50mm to over 1000mm. The 135 L handles this well. Why so salty? Can I assume that this article applies only to full frame & not to micro four thirds? What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? however i started to realise how every subject might actually be a cardboard cutout being photographed. If canon puts an IS on this lens, it would be perfect! It is worth of it's price?Any links to astrophotos with this lens?Thanks. To prevent damage to the lens finish, apply nylon acorn nuts (or cap nuts) to the tips of the retaining ring's three alignment screws. After a three-year hiatus, we've been at the return of the CP+ camera show in Yokohama, Japan. The Nikon D810A, however, is modified for astrophotography out of the box.
Best Canon Lens for Astrophotography [Top 8 Reviewed] Theres no image stabilization on the Rokinon 135mm F/2 either, but thats a non-issue for amateur astrophotographers. Bottom line, this is just an outstanding lens by any measure, one that makes clear why you'd want to pay the freight for expensive prime glass. There's literally no story!#6: Purple Flower.The isolation works because it's the only color. The author's recipe for a good photo is:1) Just shoot blindly, with no regard to what's in the frame, because the lens will blur away everything on the background.2) If (1) does not work, just head on to https://www.bhphotovideo.com, download a jpg of the lens you were using, and photoshop it on top of the taillaits of the passig car that didn't get blurred out enough.3?) I would only recommend this lens for casual photographers where missed shot means nothing. I cant wait to try this lens out during the winter months on some wide-field targets in Orion. D8XX cameras, subject isolation and quality of bokeh.Zoom lenses can not hold a candle to such primes. Flip on through what we found, and see how the lens performs in the real world in our sample gallery. In the highest contrast situations there's a hint of both purple and green fringing but both are minor and easy to remove with software. Without the blurb I would have taken it as a 24 hour news studio shot with back projection or a cut and paste layer.The other stuff is really nice though. I have the Canon 135 f/2 and loved it from day one. thank you for that great review and also the explanations. This summer I'm going to try the lenses out for LRGB images to see how they perform. She doesn't look like she is there. Lots of wet blankets around here. From my experience, the toughest test on a lense is its ability to function wide open. Whos Afraid of a Phantom: Istar Phantom 140mm F/6.5, that is? (purchased for $899), reviewed December 9th, 2006 The focuser adjustment rotates roughly 270 degrees, meaning fine-tuning on a bright star is more precise. I heard it's very sharp and well corrected. But for many of us, somewhere in between, are plenty of short to mid-tele lenses that will deliver solid service (in terms of subject separation) without carrying around still another kilo for the sake of more blur. This is so annoying that I intend to replace the Canon lens cap with a Tamron cap. I almost bought one, but couldn't manage that focal length and DoF with moving subjects and manual focus. The lens is available on eBay for around $200. Although typically unused in astrophotography, I did get a chance to see the beautiful bokeh this lens creates when shooting at F/2. image quality wise it is by far one the sharpest lenses ive ever used. Also type the lens you are interested in into the search window on Astrobin to see examples shot with that lens. It is really thanks to another commentator pointing out something that finally makes sense out of this mess: This article is by someone who just got his first first telephoto ever, and is writing about how he feels when he is trying it out. If this was used to shoot video you would think that the first image was using a green screen. Its nice to have the F/2. Are you really using 135 a lot? Some noteworthy targets to try. However, these APOs have a couple of drawbacks. To actually learn to compose the photos so that the background complements the image instead of being something that must be blurred away. http://www.adstateagent.com | http://www.printradiant.com | http://www.hitsticker.com, I love this lens.